‘Reads of 2010’ Category

  1. Macbeth by William Shakespeare

    June 12, 2010 by sassenach

    Macbeth by William Shakespeare

    I’ve already finished the semester (and graduated!), but I’ve been lazy and haven’t updated my Reads of 2010. Before the semester ended, we read Macbeth and The Tempest (review forthcoming).

    I didn’t enjoy Macbeth much at all. In fact, I found it difficult to finish. Most of my classmates liked Macbeth better than Hamlet, but for me it was the opposite. I thought Hamlet was a much more intriguing play as a whole. Different strokes, I guess. There was nothing about Macbeth that made me feel sympathetic toward him. With Hamlet and even Richard III, I found something slightly redemptive; but with Macbeth, I didn’t find that. His character struck me as very weak and boring.

    Additionally, I found the witches sort of distracting and not very enjoyable. To me, they didn’t advance the plot in any way and I felt like they were out of place in a play that didn’t seem very supernatural overall. Lastly, the character of Macbeth wasn’t very interesting to me; in fact, I was more intrigued by Lady Macbeth, but as her husband rises to power, her presence in the play dwindles considerably. This was a pattern with me–I tended to find the female characters in Shakespeare’s plays far more interesting than many of the men. Wouldn’t Macbeth have been much more interesting if it had been written as Lady Macbeth instead? Just a thought. :)


  2. Hamlet by William Shakespeare

    April 6, 2010 by sassenach

    Hamlet by William ShakespeareSo far this semester, Hamlet is my favorite of Shakespeare’s plays. Of course, I’ve only read a few others: Richard III, A Midsummer Night’s Dream, and I’m currently finishing up Macbeth. But I enjoy examining the characters in Hamlet the most. Maybe it also helps that I’ve seen the film adaptation (the Zeffirelli version), with Mel Gibson in the title role and Glenn Close as Gertrude, a version I thoroughly enjoyed, the kiss between Hamlet and Gertrude (mother and son!) notwithstanding. I think the director took some liberties with that scene, but I’ll get back to that in a bit.

    I’ve got a paper due this weekend and I’m still debating on whether to write about Hamlet or Macbeth. As I said, the characters in Hamlet are more interesting to me, but there is a character in Macbeth that stands out for me–namely, Lady Macbeth. However, since I’ve had more time to process Hamlet, I think I’ll likely write about it instead. The character of Hamlet has been discussed exhaustively, so I want to take a look at Ophelia. It seems she’s hardly in the play (compared to the amount of stage time given to Gertrude or Claudius, for example) but I find her fascinating all the same. Obviously, the suicide makes her a tragic character and Helena Bonham Carter played her brilliantly, so I’m sure that’s another reason why I’m drawn to her. Some of my classmates and I disagreed on this subject, though–whether or not Hamlet truly loved Ophelia, thereby making his comments at her gravesite sincere, or whether he basically strung her along and indirectly pushed her to kill herself. I’m of the mind to say that he did care for her, but the sting of his father’s murder, coupled with his mother’s “incestuous” marriage, led him astray to the point where he could no longer pursue Ophelia’s affections.

    hmm, this post is turning into a brainstorming session for my paper, isn’t it?

    oh, but getting back to the film version and Hamlet’s kiss with Gertrude–my instructor posed a question about this part of the play, whether the bedroom scene between Hamlet and Gertrude can be interpreted as evidence of an Oedipus Complex. I don’t think it is–there’s not enough evidence in the text itself to support that notion. Hamlet is certainly obsessed with his mother’s remarriage, but it’s more in the context of it being an affront to her dead husband so soon after his death, rather than any fixation Hamlet himself has on her. So I don’t think that part of the scene in Zeffirelli’s version is really true to canon, but it does serve to make the viewer uncomfortable and possibly question the relationship between mother and son in that moment.

    Overall, I like the character of Hamlet, flaws and all. He’s always dubbed as the great Nondecider (if that’s even a word), aka He Who Just Can’t Make a Decision. But I think he had great potential–that is, he could have been a great man in another life–and he’s fascinating to read, which makes it that much more tragic when he meets his end.


  3. A Midsummer Night’s Dream by William Shakespeare

    April 1, 2010 by sassenach

    A Midsummer Night's Dream by William ShakespeareA Midsummer Night’s Dream is the second play we read in my Intro to Shakespeare class. After the weighty read that Richard III was, Midsummer was a light, refreshing change of pace. Not only was the content more pleasant to read, but also the text itself was easier to understand. I didn’t have to refer to the modern translation as much in my No Fear Shakespeare edition.

    My instructor asked us to choose our favorite character, so of course I chose Puck. I think he was the most fun of all the characters, but I kept wondering what type of character he would translate to if Midsummer were a tragedy instead of a comedy. There were many elements in the play that can be found in Shakespeare’s tragedies. But since we know it’s a comedy, we go along with the jokes, even though they would certainly be seen as unfortunate or even mean-spirited in another context. However, I think Puck would make an excellent villain. I wonder if anyone has tried their hand at interpreting Midsummer as a tragedy.


  4. Richard III by William Shakespeare

    March 12, 2010 by sassenach

    Richard III by William ShakespeareI’m finishing my last semester before I get my B.A. in English and I finally decided to take a Shakespeare class. Ok…actually, the class was required in order to graduate. I know, I know–I am the WORST English major ever.

    Anyway, the first play we read this semester is Richard III. I was going to post a bunch of my notes from class, but I started to copy/paste and it was getting really rambly, so I’ll just summarize.

    I was pleasantly surprised by Richard III. When I found out we were starting the semester with it, I was disappointed. I had hoped to start off with a bang, with Hamlet or Macbeth, maybe. I can’t say that Richard III was an easy read; in fact, it took quite a bit of time with my Signet copy but even more time with my Richard III (No Fear Shakespeare) edition (which is a really fantastic edition and which I highly recommend). But despite the fact that I had to take my time with it, I enjoyed the play in the end.

    I went from loathing Richard and thinking he was a sociopath in the beginning, to feeling slightly sorry for him as the play progressed, to ultimately writing my analysis paper on how he can be viewed as a sympathetic character. It was an interesting exercise; when I first had the idea for the paper, I figured I’d play devil’s advocate for Richard. But through the writing process, I started believing what I wrote–or maybe I was just writing what I already believed.

    My instructor hasn’t graded our papers yet, but I’m anxiously waiting to find out what my grade is.


  5. Fallen by Lauren Kate

    March 12, 2010 by sassenach

    Fallen by Lauren KateThis post is spoiler-free.

    Fallen is a book that I’d had on my To Read list for a while. I saw it on the shelf at the bookstore and read the jacket summary, but wasn’t very impressed. So, I left it on my future reads list and didn’t decide to read it until several weeks later.

    This is a young adult novel that begins, honestly, like a romance novel. I was pretty surprised, as I knew it’s a YA novel. There’s nothing graphic but the prologue does have a bit of spice to it–mild spice, maybe? :)

    We are then introduced to the main character, a teenage girl named Luce (short for Lucinda). She’s the newest student at Sword & Cross, a reform school for troubled teens. Sword & Cross seems more like a prison, but Luce quickly makes friends–and a few enemies. Enter Daniel Grigori, the stereotypically handsome, mysterious, and seemingly otherworldly guy. Luce is, of course, drawn to him immediately. But Daniel seems to have some type of grudge against Luce, despite the face that they’re strangers.

    I’ll leave the descriptions there. The book moves at a nice pace–I wasn’t bored and even stayed up late because I didn’t want to put the book down. Something that distracted me at first (and this is a very minor nitpick), but the font size is larger than normal for a standard hardcover. Initially, I felt like I was reading a large print edition, but I got used to it pretty quickly.

    There were a few plot twists that I guessed ahead of time, but there was one in particular that I didn’t see coming. It’s nice to be surprised sometimes! Also, the climax of the book has a very Harry Potter-esque feel to it, though that was certainly unexpected as well.

    I’ll stop here before I spoil anything. As much as I’ve said, it still doesn’t really scratch the surface of Fallen. This is a nicely layered novel, especially for a YA book. There’s a forthcoming sequel, Torment, scheduled for an autumn 2010 release. I’m looking forward to it.


  6. Blue Moon by Alyson Noel

    February 7, 2010 by sassenach

    Blue Moon by Alyson NoelBlue Moon is the sequel to Evermore. Coupled with Evermore, it’s the second in the Immortals series. I like the supernatural elements–they’re slightly hokey, but not too bad. Without posting any spoilers, I will say that I liked this book.

    The thing that struck me the most is that there are several scenes that I related to, which I can only refer to as High School Hell. I really empathized with the main character, and felt drawn in to the plot. For a sequel, the story is still interesting, although there are a few moments toward the end that seem too neatly wrapped up. Then again, I don’t expect too much from a young adult novel, lol.

    Once I got to the end, I found out that there is a third book in the series, Shadowland, which I plan to read. (I thought it was going to be released in February 2010 since that’s what it said in the back of my copy of Blue Moon. But I looked up Shadowland on Amazon, and it shows the pub date as November 2009. Anyway, Shadowland has been released, and I found it locally at Borders.)

    I’m assuming this is a trilogy, which is ok with me. I’d like to see the story wrapped up. The characters are likeable, but I’m not so attached to them that I don’t want the series to end. I’m hoping I’ll find resolution in the third book.


  7. Evermore by Alyson Noel

    February 7, 2010 by sassenach

    Evermore by Alyson NoelThis is another young adult supernatural novel. Prior to reading this, I had just read Hush, Hush and really liked it, so I was hoping that Evermore would be as enjoyable.

    The protagonist is a teenage girl named Ever. She recently lost her parents, sister, and family dog (Buttercup, how cute is that) in a car accident. Ever alone survived. However, after the accident, she can now see people’s auras and hear their thoughts. Her internal world is a mess of noise and chaos.

    Then Ever meets Damen, whose thoughts she can’t read. In addition, whenever she talks with him or is touched by him, other people’s voices and auras disappear. With Damen, she’s somewhat normal again. Predictably, Ever falls in love with Damen, but that’s hardly the main plot.

    The story takes a few turns that I didn’t expect, and these parts weren’t too cheesy. They were just fantastic enough to keep me reading, though the book wasn’t the all-night page turner I had expected. Regardless, I enjoyed the ending and the book overall. There’s a sequel, and I’m interested to find out what happens next. As always, it’s interesting to see if the sequel can live up to the first book.